Government Is Listening to Your Calls at the Jail. Attorneys’ Calls Too!

Public records review

A May 26, 2026 administrative export from the inmate calling platform used by the Volusia County Corrections Facility reports 686 active user accounts connected to local, state and federal agencies, county corrections, law enforcement and system vendors.

What this record shows: The export identifies accounts marked “Active” and provides an organization, work email address and last-login entry. It is an administrative account roster, not an access-audit report.

Agencies represented in the export

The largest groups are Volusia Sheriff’s Office, Volusia County Division of Corrections, the State Attorney’s Office and Daytona Beach Police Department. The record also includes smaller municipal departments, federal agencies and vendor accounts.

Search the public-account roster

Search the names, organizations and official work email addresses transcribed from the report. Each result also shows the last-login date printed in the export. Exact duplicate rows and obvious vendor training or test accounts are omitted.

View or download the complete county record

The full 22-page PDF supplied by Volusia County is available below in its original, unredacted form.

Expand the complete inmate-calling-system user report (22-page PDF)

ICSolutions source-document library

Select a category and document. The chosen PDF opens in one expandable viewer, keeping the page compact as more records are added.

Choose a document to view

Why account oversight matters

Correctional call systems can contain privileged, sensitive or investigative communications. A current-user roster is only the starting point for oversight. The records needed to evaluate actual use would include access-role assignments, account-creation and deactivation history, call-access audit logs, supervisory approvals, applicable training and policy records, and vendor-administrator activity.

The searchable index does not repeat system-login usernames or exact login times. Readers may review those fields in the complete source document above.

This report describes the contents of a public record. Inclusion in the administrative roster is not evidence of misconduct.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *