JM Audits Video Report
Unarmed Military Veteran Tased After Police Respond to a Safety Call
Body-camera footage reviewed by JM Audits shows armed officers surrounding an older military veteran, ordering him to his knees and deploying a Taser while he appears to have his hands visible.
Watch on YouTube →A welfare response becomes a tactical operation
JM Audits says officers were sent to the veteran’s home after concerns were raised about his safety. The commentary notes that radio traffic reportedly indicated he was not threatening harm, yet multiple officers staged nearby with firearms before making contact.
Commands, a Taser and conflicting explanations
The footage shows the man walking toward officers with one hand raised and the other holding a drink. Officers repeatedly order him to keep his hands up and drop to his knees. A Taser is then deployed. Later, an officer says the man began dropping his hands, while JM Audits argues that the available camera angle does not support that explanation.
Did the officers use crisis-intervention techniques and adequate communication, or did their tactical approach unnecessarily increase the danger?
Questions about the investigation
The video says officers spoke with the man’s family and a neighbor but questions whether they attempted a direct phone conversation before surrounding the home. The veteran denies calling a suicide hotline. JM Audits also criticizes officers for discussing the private situation with a neighbor.
A supervisor reviews the footage
Near the end, a law-enforcement supervisor interviewed by JM Audits says the first appearance of the video does not show the older man presenting much of a threat and suggests that training or experience may have affected the response. He also says mental-health calls should not begin with shouting commands at an unarmed person.
Have information about this story?
Send JM Audits firsthand information, public records or related footage.
Contact JM AuditsSource note: This story was prepared from the video and YouTube’s automatically generated transcript, which may contain errors. Disputed claims and legal conclusions are attributed to the speakers or JM Audits commentary and have not been independently adjudicated.